All posts by : Tanmay Bhuta

About the author: Tanmay Bhuta is a driven and ambitious youth with a passion for global politics and economics. Raised in Mumbai, he is a leader with his school community. Most recently, he was the Deputy Secretary General of his school’s Model United Nations. He also founded and led the WEPLAY Foundation to support underprivileged children in his community. Currently in Grade 12 at the Aditya Birla World Academy, Tanmay aspires to pursue an undergraduate program in business and economics with the hope of creating a meaningful impact on the world through social entrepreneurship.

Introduction

In the global economic landscape, India has evolved into a pivotal player, characterized by its rapid trade growth and industrial expansion, particularly since the liberalization policies of 1991. Over the last three decades, India’s integration into the global market has driven substantial economic progress, transforming it into one of the world’s leading emerging economies. With major trade partners like the United States, China, and the European Union, and critical sectors such as manufacturing, agriculture, and energy driving this growth, India has established itself as a key participant in international trade.

Simultaneously, however, India is grappling with an array of environmental challenges that threaten its long-term sustainability. From the variability of monsoons, which has far-reaching impacts on agriculture, to the rising frequency of heatwaves and increasing sea levels that endanger coastal cities, the consequences of climate change are becoming more pronounced (Abbass et al, 2022). India is now at a crossroads where the imperative to foster economic growth must be reconciled with the need for urgent climate action.

In response to the growing threat of climate change, India launched the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) in 2008, aimed at promoting sustainable development and integrating climate considerations into economic planning. The NAPCC consists of eight core missions, including the National Solar Mission and the National Mission for Enhanced Energy Efficiency, which seek to balance economic development with environmental stewardship (Dechezleprêtre et al, 2022). However, the implementation of these policies has raised questions regarding their impact on India’s burgeoning trade sectors. The dual objectives of economic expansion and climate mitigation present significant challenges, as policies designed to curb carbon emissions may hinder the growth of energy-intensive industries that form the backbone of India’s trade economy (Durán-Romero et al, 2020). The significance of this paper lies in its exploration of the trade-offs between climate mitigation and economic growth in India, a developing nation with both ambitious climate goals and pressing economic demands. By investigating how the NAPCC affects key trade sectors, this research seeks to provide insights into how India can harmonize its climate policies with its trade objectives, contributing to the broader discourse on sustainable development in emerging economies.

Historical Context

India’s economic transformation can be traced back to the liberalization reforms of 1991, a watershed moment in the country’s history that shifted its economic model from a protectionist, state-controlled economy to one that embraced market-oriented policies and global trade. Prior to 1991, India had followed a highly restrictive economic model characterized by heavy government intervention, import substitution policies, and a focus on self-reliance. This approach, while initially fostering some degree of industrialization and development post-independence, had by the late 1980s led to stagnation, inefficiency, and an unsustainable fiscal deficit. India was on the brink of a severe balance-of-payments crisis, necessitating a fundamental overhaul of its economic policies (Hussain et al, 2020).

The reforms introduced in 1991, led by then Finance Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh, marked a decisive break from this protectionist approach. They included dismantling the License Raj (a complex system of permits and regulations that stifled private enterprise), reducing tariffs and non-tariff barriers, and opening up key sectors of the economy to foreign direct investment (FDI). The privatization of state-owned enterprises and the creation of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) further encouraged industrialization and export-oriented growth (Joshi and Patel, 2009).

As a result, between 1991 and 2020, India experienced a profound economic transformation. The country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew by an average of 6-7% annually, positioning it among the fastest-growing major economies in the world. India’s export volume increased from approximately $18 billion in 1991 to over $300 billion by 2020, reflecting the growing importance of the country in global supply chains. Imports also surged during this period, rising from $24 billion in 1991 to over $450 billion by 2020, as India became increasingly integrated into the global economy. By 2020, trade accounted for nearly 40% of India’s GDP, demonstrating the country’s dependence on external markets for its continued economic expansion (Joshi and Patel, 2009).

This period also witnessed the rise of key economic sectors that propelled India’s trade growth and positioned the country as a global player in various industries. For instance, the liberalization era coincided with the rise of India’s IT and services sector, which quickly became one of the country’s largest and most globally competitive industries. By leveraging its skilled workforce and competitive labor costs, India became a global hub for software development, IT services, and business process outsourcing (BPO). Leading companies such as Infosys, TCS, and Wipro became household names in the global IT industry, and India’s services exports, particularly in IT, grew exponentially, reaching over $200 billion by 2020 (Hussain et al, 2020).

Additionally, India’s textiles and garment industry, traditionally a major component of its economy, also saw significant growth in the post-liberalization period. Favorable trade policies, along with access to global markets, enabled the industry to expand its export base, particularly to markets in the United States, Europe, and Southeast Asia. India became one of the largest textile exporters in the world, with the industry employing millions of workers across the country.

Environmental Challenges

India, with its vast geographic and climatic diversity is vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. From the towering Himalayas in the north to the extensive coastal plains in the south, the country’s varied ecosystems are under increasing strain due to global warming. The consequences of these environmental challenges are far-reaching, affecting everything from food security and water resources to public health and economic stability. These challenges necessitate not only immediate and robust climate mitigation policies but also long-term strategies for adaptation and resilience.

Monsoon rains are the lifeblood of India’s agricultural economy. Approximately 60% of India’s agricultural land is rain-fed, meaning the livelihood of millions of farmers and the food security of the nation are intricately tied to the performance of the monsoon season (Bekun, 2022). Historically, India has relied on the timely and predictable arrival of the monsoon to irrigate its crops, but climate change is altering this delicate balance.

Rising temperatures are one of the most visible manifestations of climate change in India. The frequency and intensity of heatwaves have increased dramatically over the past two decades, with severe consequences for public health, agriculture, energy consumption, and labor productivity. Furthermore, India’s long coastline, spanning over 7,500 kilometers, makes it particularly vulnerable to the impacts of sea-level rise, a consequence of global warming driven by the melting of polar ice caps and the thermal expansion of seawater. Coastal regions, which are home to nearly 20% of India’s population, are already experiencing the effects of rising sea levels, including coastal erosion, saltwater intrusion, and increased frequency of storm surges (Malhi, Kaur and Kaushik, 2021).

In addition to these coastal and agricultural challenges, India faces a significant environmental threat in the form of glacial retreat in the Himalayas. The Himalayas, often referred to as the “Water Tower of Asia,” are the source of many of India’s major rivers, including the Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Indus (Roy et al, 2022). These rivers provide essential water for drinking, agriculture, and hydroelectric power to millions of people across northern India.

India’s National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC), launched in 2008 represents one of the country’s most significant efforts to address the multifaceted challenges posed by climate change. As one of the fastest-growing economies in the world, India faces the critical task of balancing its developmental needs with environmental sustainability. The NAPCC is a comprehensive strategy designed to promote sustainable development by integrating climate change mitigation and adaptation into the country’s economic and social planning (Shah, 2022). The plan is structured around eight core missions, each addressing key sectors such as energy, agriculture, water, and forestry, with the overall objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions while ensuring the resilience of vulnerable communities and industries.

The NAPCC’s framework reflects the Indian government’s recognition of the growing threat that climate change poses to the country’s economy, particularly its trade sectors (Shivanna, 2022). From fluctuating agricultural yields due to unpredictable monsoons to rising costs in energy-intensive industries due to stricter environmental regulations, the NAPCC is aimed at creating policies that foster long-term sustainability without compromising economic growth.

Each of the eight missions under the NAPCC targets a specific aspect of climate change mitigation and adaptation, with tailored strategies to meet India’s broader environmental and developmental goals. These missions are designed to complement each other, creating a holistic approach to addressing both national and international climate commitments. For instance, the National Solar Mission is arguably the flagship initiative under the NAPCC, with the ambitious goal of increasing the share of solar energy in India’s total energy mix (Roy et al, 2022). The mission aims to promote the development of solar energy infrastructure, making India a global leader in solar power production and reducing the country’s dependence on fossil fuels.

While the NAPCC has made significant strides in addressing the impacts of climate change, its implementation has faced several challenges. One of the biggest challenges has been the lack of adequate financing for large-scale infrastructure projects, particularly in the renewable energy and water management sectors (Abbass et al, 2022). While international climate finance, such as funding from the Green Climate Fund, has provided some support, the scale of investment required is far greater than the funds currently available.

The complexity of coordinating between various government ministries, state governments and local authorities has also slowed the implementation of several key missions. For example, land acquisition for solar projects has faced delays due to bureaucratic inefficiencies, while water management programs have been hampered by conflicting state-level policies.

Industries that rely heavily on fossil fuels, such as coal mining, steel, and cement, have lobbied against stricter environmental regulations, citing concerns about job losses and reduced profitability. This has created political challenges for the government in implementing energy efficiency and renewable energy initiatives at the required scale.

Furthermore, the impact of the NAPCC on India’s trade sectors has been mixed. Energy-intensive industries, such as steel, cement, and textiles, have faced higher production costs due to compliance with energy efficiency standards, reducing their competitiveness in global markets. At the same time, the renewable energy sector has created new opportunities for trade, particularly in solar and wind technologies (Malhi, Kaur and Kaushik, 2021). However, the lack of a well-developed domestic manufacturing base for renewable energy components has led to a reliance on imports, particularly from China, which presents challenges for India’s goal of energy self-sufficiency.

This research on the impact of India’s National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) on its trade economy is anchored in two key theoretical frameworks that explore the complex relationship between trade policies and environmental regulations: the Porter Hypothesis and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. These theories provide contrasting perspectives on how environmental regulations, like those under the NAPCC, can influence economic competitiveness, trade patterns, and industrial behavior. The framework also incorporates a comparative analysis of environmental policies in other developing countries, such as China and Brazil, to draw parallels and lessons for India’s trade-environment nexus (Suman, 2021).

The Porter Hypothesis, first introduced by economist Michael Porter in the 1990s, challenges the traditional view that environmental regulations inevitably impose a burden on industries by increasing operational costs and reducing competitiveness. Instead, Porter argues that well-designed and stringent environmental regulations can stimulate innovation, improve resource efficiency, and enhance productivity (Zhang and Fujimori, 2020). According to this hypothesis, industries that are subject to strict environmental regulations may be forced to innovate and adopt cleaner, more efficient technologies, which can lead to cost savings in the long term and give these industries a competitive edge in global markets.

The Porter Hypothesis posits that environmental regulations, rather than being solely a cost burden, can drive innovation in cleaner production technologies and more efficient resource use. In the context of the NAPCC, regulations such as energy efficiency targets under the National Mission for Enhanced Energy Efficiency (NMEEE) or emissions standards under the National Solar Mission can force energy-intensive industries (such as steel, cement, and textiles) to innovate. For example, industries that invest in energy-saving technologies may not only reduce their greenhouse gas emissions but also lower their energy consumption, thereby cutting costs over the long term. This increased efficiency can improve their competitiveness in both domestic and international markets, particularly as global demand shifts toward greener products and processes.

Recommendations

Based on the analysis of India’s climate policies under the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC), the sectoral impacts of these policies, and international comparisons with China, Brazil, and South Africa, this section offers a set of strategic recommendations. These aim to align India’s climate policies with its trade and economic goals, ensuring that sustainable development and economic growth are mutually reinforcing rather than conflicting. The recommendations are designed to help India navigate the complex trade-environment nexus and capitalize on the opportunities presented by the global transition to a low-carbon economy.

To effectively integrate trade and climate policies, India must adopt a holistic and coordinated approach that aligns the objectives of the NAPCC with its broader economic development goals. The country’s economic policies, particularly those related to trade, energy, and industrial development, must be reconciled with its climate ambitions to avoid conflicts and inefficiencies (Fekete et al, 2021).

India’s federal structure means that state governments have significant authority over local economic policies, including energy production, industrial regulations, and infrastructure development. To ensure that state-level policies align with national climate goals, the central government should offer financial incentives to states that meet renewable energy targets and other climate objectives. States that make significant progress toward decarbonizing their industries, reducing emissions, or adopting renewable energy sources could receive preferential access to federal funds, tax breaks, or infrastructure grants. This approach will encourage states to implement climate-friendly policies without fearing economic losses, thus promoting policy coherence across all levels of government.

For example, coal-dependent states like Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh could be incentivized to diversify their energy portfolios by investing in renewable energy projects, reducing their reliance on coal, and transitioning to a low-carbon economy.

Currently, there is a lack of coordination between national and state-level policies, particularly in sectors like energy and agriculture, where many state governments continue to provide subsidies for fossil fuels and water-intensive crops. A unified national policy framework that aligns climate and trade objectives would ensure that all stakeholders—both at the national and state levels—work toward the same goals. This integrated framework could include revising energy subsidies (Klenert et al, 2020). Gradually phasing out subsidies for fossil fuels, especially coal, while increasing financial support for renewable energy projects such as solar and wind. This would shift investment toward cleaner energy sources while maintaining economic growth in sectors that are heavily reliant on energy. Additionally, reallocating subsidies from water-intensive crops like rice and sugarcane to climate-resilient crops such as pulses, millet, and sorghum. This shift would reduce the environmental impact of agriculture while maintaining export competitiveness in emerging markets for eco-friendly, climate-resilient crops (Nawaz et al, 2021).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the rising tension between India’s climate change mitigation policies, outlined in the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC), and its trade economy underscores the challenge of balancing economic growth with environmental sustainability. Key sectors like agriculture, manufacturing, and energy face increased costs due to climate policies, particularly in energy-intensive industries such as steel and cement. While short-term economic burdens exist, the NAPCC has opened opportunities in renewable energy, positioning India as a potential leader in the global green economy.

However, misalignment between national climate goals and state-level economic priorities, such as coal subsidies, hampers progress. International models, such as China’s carbon pricing and Brazil’s Low-Carbon Agriculture Plan, demonstrate the feasibility of harmonizing trade with climate action. To move forward, India must integrate national and state policies, provide financial incentives for green technologies, and invest in capacity building to ensure industries can transition smoothly. Public-private partnerships, long-term planning, and R&D investment in sustainable technologies will be crucial for maintaining India’s global competitiveness. In embracing this green transformation, India can lead both in climate action and trade.

References

• Abbass, Kashif, Muhammad Zeeshan Qasim, Huaming Song, Muntasir Murshed, Haider Mahmood, and Ijaz Younis. “A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29, no. 28 (2022): 42539-42559.
• Bekun, Festus Victor. “Mitigating emissions in India: accounting for the role of real income, renewable energy consumption and investment in energy.” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 12, no. 1 (2022): 188-192.
• Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Adrien Fabre, Tobias Kruse, Bluebery Planterose, Ana Sanchez Chico, and Stefanie Stantcheva. Fighting climate change: International attitudes toward climate policies. No. w30265. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2022.
• Durán-Romero, Gemma, Ana M. López, Tatiana Beliaeva, Marcos Ferasso, Christophe Garonne, and Paul Jones. “Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 160 (2020): 120246.
• Fekete, Hanna, Takeshi Kuramochi, Mark Roelfsema, Michel den Elzen, Nicklas Forsell, Niklas Höhne, Lisa Luna et al. “A review of successful climate change mitigation policies in major emitting economies and the potential of global replication.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 137 (2021): 110602.
• Hussain, Sajid, Jie Huang, Jing Huang, Shakeel Ahmad, Satyabrata Nanda, Sumera Anwar, Awais Shakoor et al. “Rice production under climate change: adaptations and mitigating strategies.” Environment, Climate, Plant and Vegetation Growth (2020): 659-686.
• Klenert, David, Franziska Funke, Linus Mattauch, and Brian O’Callaghan. “Five lessons from COVID-19 for advancing climate change mitigation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 76 (2020): 751-778.
• Joshi, Vijay, and Urjit R. Patel. India and Climate-change Mitigation. na, 2009.
• Malhi, Gurdeep Singh, Manpreet Kaur, and Prashant Kaushik. “Impact of climate change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: A review.” Sustainability 13, no. 3 (2021): 1318.
• Nawaz, Muhammad Atif, Usha Seshadri, Pranav Kumar, Ramaisa Aqdas, Ataul Karim Patwary, and Madiha Riaz. “Nexus between green finance and climate change mitigation in N-11 and BRICS countries: empirical estimation through difference in differences (DID) approach.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (2021): 6504-6519.
• Roy, Paramita, Subodh Chandra Pal, Rabin Chakrabortty, Indrajit Chowdhuri, Asish Saha, and Manisa Shit. “Climate change and groundwater overdraft impacts on agricultural drought in India: Vulnerability assessment, food security measures and policy recommendation.” Science of the Total Environment 849 (2022): 157850.
• Shah, Tushaar. “Climate change and groundwater: India’s opportunities for mitigation and adaptation.” In Water resources policies in South Asia, pp. 213-243. Routledge India, 2020.
• Shivanna, Kundaranahalli R. “Climate change and its impact on biodiversity and human welfare.” Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy 88, no. 2 (2022): 160-171.
• Stock, Ryan, Sumit Vij, and Asif Ishtiaque. “Powering and puzzling: climate change adaptation policies in Bangladesh and India.” Environment, Development and Sustainability 23, no. 2 (2021): 2314-2336.
• Suman, A. “Role of renewable energy technologies in climate change adaptation and mitigation: A brief review from Nepal.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 151 (2021): 111524.
• Zhang, Runsen, and Shinichiro Fujimori. “The role of transport electrification in global climate change mitigation scenarios.” Environmental Research Letters 15, no. 3 (2020): 034019.