About the author:
Natassha Vairavan currently studies in the 11th grade at The International School Bangalore. She is enthusiastic about social change and financial literacy. She aspires to build a career in corporate law.
Abstract
The MSP policy, designed to stabilize income for farmers by guaranteeing a minimum price for their crops, plays a crucial role in India’s agricultural sector. However, there are significant gaps and challenges associated with its implementation that potentially undermine its effectiveness in achieving food security. This research paper provides a comprehensive analysis of India’s Minimum Support Price (MSP) policy, focusing on its effectiveness in ensuring food security. An extensive review of existing literature is conducted with the goal of providing innovative solutions for this policy challenge.
Introduction
India’s agricultural sector is the backbone of its economy. The World Bank asserts that a staggering three-quarters of India’s population are reliant on rural income. Rural areas house approximately 770 million individuals, who must meet the growing demands of India’s rising population and income to avoid food insecurity. Working as a “global agricultural powerhouse”, India harvests the world’s largest production of pulses and spices whilst being the second largest contributor to the supply of wheat, cotton, rice and sugarcane (Landes, 2008).
The Minimum Support Price (MSP) is a policy intervention in which the government sets the minimum price for 22 mandated crops. This includes 14 crops of the kharif season, ones sown during monsoons (June to September) such as pulses, sugarcane, maize and millets, as well as 6 rabi crops that are sown in winter and 2 commercial crops. The decided upon price for these products are ones at which they would be bought directly from the farmers if the open market prices are less than the cost incurred (Kumar and Sekher, 2023). This occurs twice annually under the intention of two main objectives, namely that of protection of farmers from distress sales and procurement of food grains for public distribution.
Objectives of the Minimum Support Price (MSP)
In sum, the function of the Minimum Support Price (MSP) policy in securing food security in India is of paramount importance, and its multifaceted impact warrants thorough examination. Firstly, the MSP acts as a mainstay in sustaining stable food production within the nation. By ensuring a price floor for agricultural commodities, it presents farmers with a well-grounded income source, incentivizing them to engage in harvesting consistently (Brink, 2014). This assurance is rewarded with a fostered dependable and uninterrupted food supply. Moreover, the MSP acts as a barricade against food price volatility. In the absence of a minimum price guarantee, food prices can exhibit critical fluctuations due to factors like climatic conditions, market dynamics, and global supply shocks. These price oscillations can introduce uncertainty in terms of food availability and affordability for consumers. The MSP functions as a stabilizing force, curbing price fluctuations and providing a safety net for consumers (Gulati and Sharma, 1995).
The Minimum Support Price (MSP) is determined after considering numerous factors, including production costs, market trends, and farmers’ general well-being. In India, there are two primary cropping seasons: ‘Rabi’ and ‘Kharif’. The government announces the MSP at the start of each cropping season. The Commission on Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) calculates and proposes the MSP. After the government has adequately evaluated the primary arguments made by the CACP, the MSP is established. The CACP uses a comprehensive view of a particular commodity or group of commodities to calculate the MSP. A key factor in determining the MSP is the cost of production, which includes various raw materials including labor, seeds, fertilizers, irrigation, machinery, and other components.
The MSP acts as extended assurance for investment decisions of producers. It was introduced with a guarantee that prices would remain steady, even in the event of a bumper crop, to offer economic stability to the agricultural sector and promote increased production. As a subsidy scheme, the government also leverages the MSP for poverty alleviation.
Additionally, the policy prevents distress sales. This is because on average, the monthly income made by a family reliant upon agriculture is less than Rs. 9000, or approximately USD $130. Hence, producers do not generate a surplus saving for the purchase of inputs dedicated to the next cropping season. Small and marginalized farmers also face challenges in obtaining loans, rendering credit access a struggle for them. Therefore, if forced into distress-sale of produce at inadequate prices, farmers are unable to buy high quality supplies such as fertilizers and seeds for their next harvest, further decreasing their income from the next cycle. The Minimum Support Price prevents this crisis.
The MSP also aids in informed decision-making. The government makes public their set MSP before the sowing season for 23 crops. This advance information helps the farmer to make an informed decision about which crop to sow for maximum economic benefit within the limitations of his farm size, climate and irrigation facilities.
Finally, the MSP acts as a benchmark for private buyers. The MSP functions as a market indicator, working as a price-signal it alerts to merchants that to be sold a farmer’s produce, their offering price needs to be higher than that of the policy’s. This establishes the MSP as a referencing anchor for the agriculture commodity market. Although it is unable to guarantee market prices will exceed the MSP, it serves to provide assurance that these prices will not drop significantly below the MSP level, thus reducing income instability.
Policy Recommendations
The Minimum Support Price (MSP) policy in India is a crucial component of the agricultural policy framework. It is intended to insure agricultural producers against any sharp fall in farm prices and aims to stabilize the income of the farmers. However, there are several challenges and inefficiencies associated with the current MSP policy which have implications for both the policy’s effectiveness and broader agricultural outcomes (Shakeel, Salman, Shazli, Naqvi and Siddiqui, 2023). They include the existence of market distortions that undermine the intended impact of the MSP. For instance, delayed payments to agricultural producers and regional disparities are threats to the implementation of the policy as they can impede the equitable distribution of MSP benefits. Additionally, efficient and transparent procurement mechanisms are crucial (Gulati and Sharma, 1995). This includes ensuring the availability of procurement centers, timely payments to farmers, and reducing bureaucratic hurdles. Implementing a direct benefit transfer system where the difference between the MSP and the market price is directly paid to the farmer can reduce the administrative burden and leakages in the system.
Budgetary constraints are one of the foremost challenges as there is a financial burden posed by the Minimum Support Policy to the Indian government. Recurrent increases in the MSP strains government budgets and creates an opportunity cost for other crucial sectors within the economy, endangering the long-term viability of the policy. Critics argue that the MSP policy, when not carefully managed can contribute to overall price inflation in the economy. This inflationary pressure can affect not only consumers but also the cost of production for various industries, potentially leading to economic imbalances.
Furthermore, the MSP primarily focuses on a select set of crops, leaving out a considerable portion of agricultural produce. It can lead to skewed cropping patterns and environmental issues like water depletion. Broadening the MSP to include a larger variety of crops, including perishables and pulses, can encourage crop diversification and sustainability (Vanshika and Harsana, 2022). This limited coverage can leave many farmers without MSP benefits, exacerbating income disparities within the agricultural sector. Furthermore, the role of intermediaries in the agricultural supply chain presents a challenge to the effective implementation of the MSP. Middlemen can sometimes exploit farmers, leading to suboptimal benefits from the policy and reducing its impact on farmer income (Acharya, 1997).
Introducing a closely linked relationship between subsidization and sustainable agricultural practices may promote crop diversification, pushing farmers to harvest grains that have a lower carbon footprint and require less water-intensive production. Furthermore, by granting higher MSPs for the adoption of such practices, producers are incentivized to engage in organic farming, no-till farming, precision agriculture and more. However, this too poses a financial burden on the government (Shenggen, Gulati and Thorat, 2008).
To alleviate this concern, public-private relationships can be encouraged as they serve as a bulwark against the tight budgetary restrictions. Correspondingly, this can enhance market efficiency and provide marginalized areas with an increased access to markets and technology (Kumar and Sekher, 2023). Effective market linkages are essential to ensure that farmers receive the MSP. Developing infrastructure such as warehouses, cold storage, and efficient transportation, and strengthening the agricultural supply chain can help in better implementation of the MSP. For the MSP to thrive, market efficiency should be a critical objective. Via the improvement of market infrastructure, storage facilities and transportation networks to prevent post-harvest losses and warrant farmers earn suitable prices for their produce, it is possible to mitigate price volatility (Dantwala, 1976).
Conclusion
Despite its multifaceted implications, India’s Minimum Support Price policy plays a pivotal part in the country’s cultivation of agricultural output. Its effect on the economic viability of farmers and food security manifest it to be a safety net for income stability. Behaving as both a shock buffer and an indicator of financially rewarding crops, the MSP achieves its intention of assistance in alleviating wage insecurity but extends further into sustaining stable food production for a vast population.
Regardless, the policy is undermined by several cracks in its foundation such as budgetary constriction, environmentally negative externalities and inflation. Upon reviewing the MSP, policymakers have to consider how to encourage crop-diversification suitable to regions and resource allocation. A carefully calibrated and evolving MSP can have long-term resilience if it is able to overcome adversity and continually ensure the economic well-being of farmers, food sovereignty in a manner that is sustainable both financially and ecologically.
References
- Kumar, Deepak, and Madhushree Sekher. “Minimum Support Price and the Changing Nature of Rural Economy and Its Implications on Agriculture in Haryana.” Business Perspectives and Research (2023): 22785337231164205.
- Korekallu Srinivasa, Aditya, K. V. Praveen, Subash Surendran Padmaja, M. L. Nithyashree, and Girish K. Jha. “Does a farmer’s knowledge of minimum support price (MSP) affect the farm-gate price? Evidence from India.” Journal of Economics and Development 25, no. 4 (2023): 302-316.
- Vanshika, Sanjana, and Pawan Harsana. “Minimum support price conundrum and sustainable farming: a study of the impact of the socio-economic factors on sustainable agriculture.” Vantage J Them Anal (2022).
- Brink, Lars. “Support to Agriculture in India in 1995-2013 and the Rules of the WTO.” International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium (IATRC) Working Paper 14-01 (2014).
- Bhattarai, B. K., and A. GC. “Government intervention strategy in agriculture price policy: A case of minimum support price in Nepal.” Journal of Agriculture and Environment 21 (2020): 70-81.
- Acharya, Shabd Swaroop. “Agricultural price policy and development: some facts and emerging issues.” Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 52, no. 1 (1997): 1-47.
- Landes, Maurice R. “Indian agriculture and policy in transition.” Food for Policy-Reforming Agriculture. Cambridge University (2008).
- Gulati, Ashok, and Anil Sharma. “Subsidy syndrome in Indian agriculture.” Economic and Political Weekly (1995): A93-A102.
- Shakeel, Adnan, Mohd Sadiq Salman, Tasneem Shazli, Hasan Raja Naqvi, and Masood Ahsan Siddiqui. “Reforming Indian agriculture and the rise of farmer’s protest in India: Tracing the discourse and the way ahead.” Journal of Public Affairs 23, no. 1 (2023): e2847.
- Dantwala, M. Li. “Agricultural policy in India since independence.” Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 31, no. 902-2018-1319 (1976): 31-53.
- Fan, Shenggen, Ashok Gulati, and Sukhadeo Thorat. “Investment, subsidies, and pro‐poor growth in rural India.” Agricultural Economics 39, no. 2 (2008): 163-170.