About the author:
Aarya Punit Kaaji is a 10th grade student studying in UWC Singapore. He is deeply driven towards making a positive change in the world, which can be seen through his IR and policy-related projects. In the future, he intends to build on the work he already does in international relations through a career in diplomacy. Aarya intends to major in International Relations for his undergraduate studies.
Abstract
Model United Nations is a transformative educational program that teaches young people valuable skills and knowledge about the United Nations, diplomacy, and international relations. Through simulation, it encourages students to develop not only their intellect and talents but also their understanding and empathy for global issues and perspectives. This research paper investigates the impact of Model United Nations (MUN) programs in shaping foreign policy decisions. By engaging students and young professionals in simulated diplomatic negotiations, MUNs seek to foster a deeper understanding of international relations and global governance. The results of this research study highlight the role of MUN as a valuable educational tool that not only enhances diplomatic skills but also actively contributes to the international policy-making process. It offers insights into how educational simulations like MUN can serve as a bridge between academic environments and real-world political engagement, potentially shaping the landscape of global diplomacy.
Introduction
Model United Nations (MUN) is an educational simulation that provides students with a deep dive into the world of diplomacy, international relations, and the United Nations. MUN aims to educate participants about current events, topics in international relations, diplomacy, and the United Nations agenda (Obendorf & Randerson, 2012). The activity involves researching, public speaking, debating, writing skills, critical thinking, teamwork, and leadership abilities.
The concept of MUN dates back to the mid-20th century. The first recorded instance of a Model United Nations conference was held at St. Lawrence University in 1949. This was just a few years after the creation of the United Nations itself in 1945, following the end of World War II. The founders of MUN sought to create a platform for students to understand the workings of the UN and engage with global issues, reflecting the new global emphasis on international cooperation (Asal, 2005).
The purpose of MUN extends beyond mere knowledge of the UN and its procedures. It aims to foster a better understanding among young people about the complex international issues that confront the global community and the process by which solutions can be reached. Participants, known as “delegates,” are assigned countries to represent in one of the UN’s numerous bodies or other international forums (Engel, Pallas & Lambert, 2017). They are tasked with solving a global issue through debate and negotiation, reflecting the policies and perspectives of the countries they represent.
During a typical MUN conference, delegates prepare draft resolutions, plot strategy, negotiate with supporters and adversaries, resolve conflicts, and navigate the UN’s rules of procedure—all in the interest of mobilizing “international cooperation” to resolve problems that affect countries all over the world. This intense negotiation and decision-making process is at the heart of every MUN session (Blair, Griggs & Mackillop, 2018). Hence, the significance of MUN extends beyond the educational sphere, as it seeks to imbue young leaders with the skills necessary for international diplomacy and policy negotiation.
Despite its widespread popularity and the growing number of participants globally, the real-world impact of MUN, particularly its effectiveness in influencing foreign policy, remains an under-explored area of study. This research paper aims to fill this gap by evaluating how MUN experiences translate into professional skills and inclinations that may influence and potentially shape foreign policy decisions (Jesuit & Strachan, 2021). This study provides empirical insights into the extent to which MUN experiences contribute to a practical understanding of and engagement with global policy issues. This research paper offers a deeper understanding of how simulated diplomatic engagements can affect real international relations and governance.
The Impact of MUNs among students
Understanding international political events is crucial for students as it prepares them for an interconnected world. The global landscape is increasingly influenced by political actions and decisions that cross national borders, impacting economies, environments, and societal norms worldwide. By being informed about international politics, students develop a broader perspective, which is essential for fostering empathy and cultural sensitivity (Ehrlander & Boylan 2017). However, more often than not, schools do not have classes or sessions that directly address international affairs for students.
Model United Nations help students to become global citizens who can engage thoughtfully in discussions and make informed decisions about international issues. It enhances their critical thinking skills as they analyze complex global situations, understand different viewpoints, and evaluate the impact of political events on their lives and communities.
Model United Nations (MUN) can play a significant role in shaping the foreign policy perspectives of its participants, often by fostering a deeper understanding of international affairs and diplomacy. MUNs serve as an educational simulation where participants, typically students, role-play as delegates of various countries and engage in debates and discussions on global issues. This immersive experience provides a profound understanding of how international bodies like the United Nations operate (Giovanello, Kirk & Kromer, 2013). Participants learn about the complexities of international relations and diplomacy, including negotiation tactics, resolution drafting, and the importance of alliances and strategies.
Effective foreign policy often hinges on negotiation, compromise, and dialogue. MUN conferences provide a practical arena for developing these crucial skills. Delegates learn how to represent their assigned country’s interests, negotiate with other delegates, and navigate through conflicts to reach consensus. These skills are directly applicable to real-world diplomacy and foreign policy-making.
MUN participants discuss and deliberate on a range of current global issues—such as climate change, human rights, peace and security, and economic development. This exposure helps them understand the challenges and viewpoints of different nations. Such awareness is critical for anyone involved in formulating or influencing foreign policy, as it aids in creating informed, comprehensive, and empathetic policies that take into account global complexities.
Through MUN, delegates become familiar with international laws, treaties, and conventions. This knowledge is indispensable for those who aspire to engage in foreign policy or international law careers. Understanding the legal frameworks that govern international relations helps in crafting policies that are not only effective but also legally sound.
MUN conferences attract students and young professionals from various backgrounds and nationalities, offering a unique networking opportunity. These interactions can lead to long-term collaborations and partnerships, enriching participants’ understanding and perspectives on international affairs (Giovanello, Kirk & Kromer, 2013). Networking in such diverse environments can mirror the real-world dynamics of international diplomacy, where relationships and alliances play crucial roles.
Many MUN participants go on to careers in diplomacy, international relations, politics, and related fields. The skills and insights gained from MUN can inspire and equip them to take on significant roles in these areas. This creates a pipeline of knowledgeable and skilled individuals who are familiar with the workings of global diplomacy and may contribute to their country’s foreign policy directly or indirectly.
MUN empowers young people to engage with complex global issues and understand the roles they can play in addressing them. This early engagement can lead to a lifelong interest in international affairs and policy-making, encouraging a more informed and proactive citizenry capable of contributing to foreign policy discussions and decisions. By fostering these skills and understandings, Model United Nations can indirectly shape the future of foreign policy by preparing the next generation of leaders with a solid foundation in international affairs and diplomacy.
Limitations of the MUN simulation
Model United Nations (MUN) simulations are educational exercises where students role-play delegates from different countries and debate issues, trying to solve real-world problems using the procedures of the United Nations. While these simulations are great for teaching about diplomacy, international law, and global issues, their use in real international peace negotiations is not practical for several reasons.
Firstly, real-world international conflicts and negotiations involve complex political, economic, and cultural factors that are difficult to fully replicate in a simulation. MUN simulations simplify these issues so that participants can understand and engage with them in a limited time (Keohane, 1984).
Real negotiations involve actual stakeholders—governments, rebel groups, international organizations, and others who have a direct impact on the outcome. MUN participants are primarily students who do not have the authority or real-world experience to make binding decisions.
Diplomats and officials who participate in real peace negotiations usually have years of expertise and experience, which is crucial for understanding the nuances of international relations and for crafting effective and lasting solutions.
Furthermore, decisions made in real negotiations carry legal and political weight, impacting millions of lives and the future of nations (Ehrlander & Boylan 2017). Decisions made in MUN simulations have no real-world consequences, which fundamentally changes the nature of decision-making.
While MUN includes discussions on global issues, it does not encompass the full range of perspectives and interests that actual diplomats must consider. For example, economic constraints, national security interests, and domestic political pressures that heavily influence real-world decisions are often simplified or overlooked in simulations (Ripley, Carter & Grove, 2009).
MUN participants are typically students and young adults who may not have the influence or networks that established professionals in international relations or government roles possess. This demographic limitation can restrict the extent to which ideas generated in MUN can be elevated to real-world policy forums (Brown, 2018).
The issues dealt with in MUNs are often complex and require in-depth knowledge and practical experience, which participants may not possess. This can lead to oversimplified solutions that do not fully address the intricacies of actual geopolitical problems.
MUN simulations are generally disconnected from the real-life policymakers and international bodies that implement foreign policy. Without direct interaction or engagement with actual decision-making processes, the influence of MUN on policy is inherently limited.
Best Practices for citizens in influencing Foreign Policy
Citizens can influence foreign policy in several ways, often by engaging directly with their political system or through civil society activities. One of the key methods is by electing representatives who share their views on foreign policy. This is one of the most direct ways citizens can influence decisions at the national level. This includes voting for presidential candidates, senators, and representatives who have a say in foreign affairs (Asal & Kratoville, 2013).
Individuals can join or form interest groups that lobby government officials on foreign policy issues (Lantis J, 1998). By organizing, they can amplify their voice and have more impact than they might as individuals. Furthermore, participating in protests or public demonstrations can draw attention to specific foreign policy issues and influence public opinion and policymakers.
Launching or signing petitions can demonstrate public support for or opposition to particular foreign policies. Campaigns, whether online or in person, can mobilize public opinion and pressure leaders to change or adopt policies (Mcintosh, 2003). Citizens can also contact their elected officials directly through letters, emails, or phone calls to express their views on foreign policy issues.
Utilizing media platforms to write articles, opinion pieces, or social media posts can influence public opinion and, indirectly, policymakers. Influential voices can often reach large audiences and shape the discourse around foreign policy (Blair, Griggs & Mackillop, 2018). Many non-governmental organizations (NGOs) work on international issues and influence foreign policy through research, advocacy, and direct action. Supporting or working with these organizations can be a way to engage with foreign policy.
Conclusion
MUN simulations can still be valuable in a broader context. They can help educate future leaders, create awareness about international issues, and foster skills that are useful in diplomacy, such as negotiation, public speaking, and critical thinking. Participants in MUN are often better prepared to understand global issues and can contribute more effectively to international discourse if they pursue careers in related fields.
While they provide valuable experiences, there are several limitations to their effectiveness as tools for citizens to directly influence foreign policy. For instance, participants in MUN simulations do not hold any real power or official status to influence actual policy decisions. The resolutions and decisions made in MUN are educational and have no binding effect on real-world governments or the United Nations. Furthermore, the primary purpose of MUN is educational (Hatipoglu, Muftuler-Bac & Murphy, 2014). It aims to teach participants about diplomacy, negotiation skills, and the complexities of international relations. The simulation is designed to mirror the UN’s processes and encourage understanding, rather than to serve as a platform for actual policy advocacy or change.
In an educational context, integrating Model United Nation sessions into the curriculum enriches students’ learning experiences and prepares them for active and informed participation in a democratic society. It encourages them to think globally and act locally, understanding their role in shaping a more equitable and sustainable world.
References
- Mcintosh, Daniel. (2003). The Uses and Limits of Model United Nations in an International Relations Classroom. International Studies Perspectives, 2: 269 – 280.
- Obendorf, S., & Randerson, C. (2012). The Model United Nations simulation and the student as producer agenda. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 4(3), 1–15.
- Jesuit, D. K., & Strachan, J. (2021). Student engagement and learning outcomes in the model United Nations. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(8).
- Engel, S., Pallas, J., & Lambert, S. (2017). Model United Nations and Deep Learning: Theoretical and Professional Learning. Journal of Political Science Education, 13(2), 171–184.
- Asal V, Kratoville J. (2013). Constructing international relations simulations: Examining the pedagogy of IR simulations through a constructivist learning theory lens. Journal of Political Science Education 9(2): 132–143.
- Asal V. (2005). Playing games with international relations. International Studies Perspectives 6(3): 359–373.
- Blair A, Griggs S, Mackillop E. (2018). Engaging students as co-producers: A critical reflection on the policy commission model. Politics 38(4): 514–530.
- Brown J. (2018). Efficient, adaptable simulations: A case study of a climate negotiation game. Journal of Political Science Education 14(4): 511–522.
- Crossley-Frolick K. (2010). Beyond model UN: Simulating multi-level, multi-actor diplomacy using the millennium development goals. International Studies Perspectives 11(2): 184–201.
- Ehrlander M, Boylan B. (2017). The model arctic council: Educating postsecondary students on arctic issues and governance through simulation. International Studies Perspectives 19(1): 83–101.
- Giovanello S, Kirk J, Kromer M. (2013). Student perceptions of a role-playing simulation in an introductory international relations course. Journal of Political Science Education 9(2): 197–208.
- Hatipoglu E, Muftuler-Bac M, Murphy T. (2014). Simulation games in teaching international relations: Insights from a multi-day, multi-stage, multi-issue simulation on Cyprus. International Studies Perspectives 15(4): 394–406.
- Keohane R. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Lantis J. (1998). Simulations and experiential learning in the international relations classroom. International Negotiation 3(1): 39–57.
- Ripley B, Carter N, Grove A. (2009). League of our own: Creating a model United Nations scrimmage conference. Journal of Political Science Education 5(1): 55–70.